Hwy 10 – St. Cloud to Little Falls study
About this project study
We're identifying future safety and access needs along 30 miles of Hwy 10 between E Saint Germain St. in St. Cloud and the south limits of Little Falls in 2025-2026.
This study will analyze the corridor's current and future demographics, land use/development, maintenance operations, road and drainage conditions, and safety data.
The corridor experiences ongoing access, mobility, and safety issues:
- Numerous at-grade crossings create challenges for left-turn movements
- Traffic signals in Royalton and St. Cloud cause significant safety concerns and traffic flow issues.
The project team will pursue the following goals for the corridor as they complete the study:
- Improve safety for all users
- Enhance mobility and travel reliability
- Improve access management and corridor function
- Develop implementable, fundable, and phased recommendations
- Inform and engage the public and stakeholders
Public meetings
Upcoming
Non scheduled at this time
Held
- Held public meeting on Aug. 12, 2026, at the Royalton Middle/High School.
Did you know?
MnDOT is also working on a separate Hwy 10 preliminary engineering study between St. Cloud and Haven Township. While both efforts are focused on Hwy 10, they are distinct studies.
About this project study
We're identifying future safety and access needs along 30 miles of Hwy 10 between E Saint Germain St. in St. Cloud and the south limits of Little Falls in 2025-2026.
This study will analyze the corridor's current and future demographics, land use/development, maintenance operations, road and drainage conditions, and safety data.
The corridor experiences ongoing access, mobility, and safety issues:
- Numerous at-grade crossings create challenges for left-turn movements
- Traffic signals in Royalton and St. Cloud cause significant safety concerns and traffic flow issues.
The project team will pursue the following goals for the corridor as they complete the study:
- Improve safety for all users
- Enhance mobility and travel reliability
- Improve access management and corridor function
- Develop implementable, fundable, and phased recommendations
- Inform and engage the public and stakeholders
Public meetings
Upcoming
Non scheduled at this time
Held
- Held public meeting on Aug. 12, 2026, at the Royalton Middle/High School.
Did you know?
MnDOT is also working on a separate Hwy 10 preliminary engineering study between St. Cloud and Haven Township. While both efforts are focused on Hwy 10, they are distinct studies.
-
Royalton design concepts shown at public meeting
Share Royalton design concepts shown at public meeting on Facebook Share Royalton design concepts shown at public meeting on X (formerly Twitter) Share Royalton design concepts shown at public meeting on Linkedin Email Royalton design concepts shown at public meeting linkHwy 10—St. Cloud to Little Falls study update
MnDOT thanks the Royalton community for visiting with us at the public meeting on Aug. 12 at the Royalton High-Middle School. Here's a recap of the layout options shown.
The Hwy 10 study team showed 19 concepts. They range from small changes to larger ideas that would separate highway and local traffic or move through‑traffic around Royalton. These are early ideas, not final designs. Each option has different benefits, impacts, costs and funding needs.
Access points and local connections shown are only possible locations, and future project phases would determine them if the project moves forward.
At-grade solutions
This means Hwy 10 and local roads remain at about the same level, as they are today. These options change the existing Hwy 10 corridor and may include J-turns, roundabouts, traffic signal changes, additional lanes, or changes to where vehicles can enter, exit or cross.
Design goals- Keep Hwy 10 traveling through Royalton
- Preserves direct access and visibility for local businesses
- Have fewer property and environmental impacts than grade-separated options
- Reduce some traffic conflicts and improve safety
Local and Hwy 10 traffic would still interact at more locations. Some access points may change or close, and these options provide less separation between Hwy 10, local roads and the railroad than grade-separated improvements.
Concepts

- 01 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - update current road (PDF)
- 02 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - signals and access changes (PDF)
- 03 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - six-lanes (PDF)
- 04 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - three roundabouts (PDF)
- 05 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - roundabouts and access changes at Centre St. (PDF)
- 06 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - roundabouts and a U-turn at Centre St. (PDF)
- 07 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - roundabouts and part access at Centre St. (PDF)
- 08 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - J-turns and partial access at Centre St. (PDF)
- 09 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - signal, J-turns and median at Co. Rd. 27 (PDF)
- 10 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - signal, J-turns, partial access at Co. Rd. 27 (PDF)
- 11 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - J-turns with signalized turn access (PDF)
- 12 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - one-way street for each direction and use of roundabouts (PDF)
Lower cost option
At-grade alternatives are considered lower-cost options, estimated at less than $25 million. These improvements are more likely to fit within typical transportation funding sources and may be able to move forward in phases as funding becomes available.
Grade-separated alternative design options
This means Hwy 10 and local traffic cross at different levels instead of crossing each other directly. These options use bridges, ramps and intersections to separate Hwy 10 traffic from local crossings at key locations. Some concepts also change local road connections or direct traffic to fewer access points.
Design goals- Provide greater separation between Hwy 10 and local traffic
- Make it easier and safer to cross, enter or exit Hwy 10 at key locations
- Improve traffic flow and reduce the number of direct conflict points
- Provide more opportunities to improve crossings for people walking and biking
- Improve safety compared to current conditions
Concepts
- 13 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – interchanges at 55th Ave. and N Maple St. (PDF)
- 14 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – interchange at Centre St. (PDF)
- 15 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – jug handle interchange at Centre St (Co. Rd. 26) (PDF)
- 16 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – modified tight interchange at Second St. (PDF)
- 17 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – bridge at Maple St. (PDF)
- 18 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – realign and overpass south of 55th Ave. NW (PDF)
These improvements would be larger than the at-grade options. They would use more land and could have greater impacts on properties, businesses and local access.
Medium-cost option
Grade-separated alternatives are considered medium-cost options, estimated between $25 million and $75 million. These improvements would cost more than at-grade improvements and would require additional state, federal or local funding beyond typical funding sources.
Bypass alternative design options
This would create a new Hwy 10 route around Royalton instead of carrying through traffic directly through town. The exiting Hwy 10 through Royalton would continue to serve local traffic, while much of the long-distance traffic would use the new route around the community.

Design goals
- Reduce through traffic and traffic noise in Royalton
- Separate local traffic from high-speed Hwy 10 traffic
- Provide significant safety and traffic-flow improvements
- Create more opportunities for walking and biking improvements within Royalton
A bypass would also create the largest changes. It would move Hwy 10 travelers farther from businesses along the existing Hwy 10, require more land, potentially impact homes and farmland, and have greater environmental impacts than the other design options.
Concepts
High-cost option
Bypass alternatives are considered high-cost options, estimated at more than $75 million. Moving forward would require long-term community involvement and support to identify and advocate for major additional funding. It would also likely take longer to fund, design and build than the other alternatives.
MnDOT thanks the Royalton community for visiting with us at the open house.


Accessibility notice: The alternative PDF designs linked above contain detailed engineering graphics and are not fully accessible to people who use screen readers or other assistive technology. If you have difficulty accessing the layouts or would like the information in an alternative format, please contact the project team.
Hwy 10—St. Cloud to Little Falls study update
MnDOT thanks the Royalton community for visiting with us at the public meeting on Aug. 12 at the Royalton High-Middle School. Here's a recap of the layout options shown.
The Hwy 10 study team showed 19 concepts. They range from small changes to larger ideas that would separate highway and local traffic or move through‑traffic around Royalton. These are early ideas, not final designs. Each option has different benefits, impacts, costs and funding needs.
Access points and local connections shown are only possible locations, and future project phases would determine them if the project moves forward.
At-grade solutions
This means Hwy 10 and local roads remain at about the same level, as they are today. These options change the existing Hwy 10 corridor and may include J-turns, roundabouts, traffic signal changes, additional lanes, or changes to where vehicles can enter, exit or cross.
Design goals- Keep Hwy 10 traveling through Royalton
- Preserves direct access and visibility for local businesses
- Have fewer property and environmental impacts than grade-separated options
- Reduce some traffic conflicts and improve safety
Local and Hwy 10 traffic would still interact at more locations. Some access points may change or close, and these options provide less separation between Hwy 10, local roads and the railroad than grade-separated improvements.
Concepts

- 01 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - update current road (PDF)
- 02 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - signals and access changes (PDF)
- 03 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - six-lanes (PDF)
- 04 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - three roundabouts (PDF)
- 05 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - roundabouts and access changes at Centre St. (PDF)
- 06 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - roundabouts and a U-turn at Centre St. (PDF)
- 07 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - roundabouts and part access at Centre St. (PDF)
- 08 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - J-turns and partial access at Centre St. (PDF)
- 09 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - signal, J-turns and median at Co. Rd. 27 (PDF)
- 10 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - signal, J-turns, partial access at Co. Rd. 27 (PDF)
- 11 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - J-turns with signalized turn access (PDF)
- 12 Royalton at-grade: Hwy 10 - one-way street for each direction and use of roundabouts (PDF)
Lower cost option
At-grade alternatives are considered lower-cost options, estimated at less than $25 million. These improvements are more likely to fit within typical transportation funding sources and may be able to move forward in phases as funding becomes available.
Grade-separated alternative design options
This means Hwy 10 and local traffic cross at different levels instead of crossing each other directly. These options use bridges, ramps and intersections to separate Hwy 10 traffic from local crossings at key locations. Some concepts also change local road connections or direct traffic to fewer access points.
Design goals- Provide greater separation between Hwy 10 and local traffic
- Make it easier and safer to cross, enter or exit Hwy 10 at key locations
- Improve traffic flow and reduce the number of direct conflict points
- Provide more opportunities to improve crossings for people walking and biking
- Improve safety compared to current conditions
Concepts
- 13 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – interchanges at 55th Ave. and N Maple St. (PDF)
- 14 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – interchange at Centre St. (PDF)
- 15 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – jug handle interchange at Centre St (Co. Rd. 26) (PDF)
- 16 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – modified tight interchange at Second St. (PDF)
- 17 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – bridge at Maple St. (PDF)
- 18 Royalton grade-separated: Hwy 10 – realign and overpass south of 55th Ave. NW (PDF)
These improvements would be larger than the at-grade options. They would use more land and could have greater impacts on properties, businesses and local access.
Medium-cost option
Grade-separated alternatives are considered medium-cost options, estimated between $25 million and $75 million. These improvements would cost more than at-grade improvements and would require additional state, federal or local funding beyond typical funding sources.
Bypass alternative design options
This would create a new Hwy 10 route around Royalton instead of carrying through traffic directly through town. The exiting Hwy 10 through Royalton would continue to serve local traffic, while much of the long-distance traffic would use the new route around the community.

Design goals
- Reduce through traffic and traffic noise in Royalton
- Separate local traffic from high-speed Hwy 10 traffic
- Provide significant safety and traffic-flow improvements
- Create more opportunities for walking and biking improvements within Royalton
A bypass would also create the largest changes. It would move Hwy 10 travelers farther from businesses along the existing Hwy 10, require more land, potentially impact homes and farmland, and have greater environmental impacts than the other design options.
Concepts
High-cost option
Bypass alternatives are considered high-cost options, estimated at more than $75 million. Moving forward would require long-term community involvement and support to identify and advocate for major additional funding. It would also likely take longer to fund, design and build than the other alternatives.
MnDOT thanks the Royalton community for visiting with us at the open house.


Accessibility notice: The alternative PDF designs linked above contain detailed engineering graphics and are not fully accessible to people who use screen readers or other assistive technology. If you have difficulty accessing the layouts or would like the information in an alternative format, please contact the project team.
-
December 2025 Public Meetings
Share December 2025 Public Meetings on Facebook Share December 2025 Public Meetings on X (formerly Twitter) Share December 2025 Public Meetings on Linkedin Email December 2025 Public Meetings linkWe'd like to thank everyone who was able to attend our December 2025 public meetings for the Hwy 10 Corridor Study - St. Cloud to Little Falls. Your participation was appreciated by the project team. For community members who could not attend any of the events, the meeting boards are available at the following link:
Hwy 10 Study December 2025 Public Meeting Boards (PDF, 12,189 KB)
The below infographic summarizes some of the key feedback we heard from these events:

We'd like to thank everyone who was able to attend our December 2025 public meetings for the Hwy 10 Corridor Study - St. Cloud to Little Falls. Your participation was appreciated by the project team. For community members who could not attend any of the events, the meeting boards are available at the following link:
Hwy 10 Study December 2025 Public Meeting Boards (PDF, 12,189 KB)
The below infographic summarizes some of the key feedback we heard from these events:

-
Summer/Fall 2025
Hwy 10 – St. Cloud to Little Falls study has finished this stage- Project kickoff
Collect data on the existing roadway conditions
-
Fall/Winter 2025
Hwy 10 – St. Cloud to Little Falls study has finished this stageAnalyze data on current and future conditions of the roadway
First public meeting
-
Spring/Summer 2026
Hwy 10 – St. Cloud to Little Falls study is currently at this stageConduct a corridor analysis and develop alternative designs
Second public meeting
-
Fall 2026
this is an upcoming stage for Hwy 10 – St. Cloud to Little Falls studyShare the preferred alternative designs and next steps
Draft the implementation plan
-
Winter 2026
this is an upcoming stage for Hwy 10 – St. Cloud to Little Falls study- Complete the final report
-
Phone 320-223-6526 Email Thomas.Cruikshank@state.mn.us